I still dd not see that kind of behavior. So, to try and figure out why others were seeing that behavior, I reinstalled Comodo internet Security again. I had never seen the Comodo AntiError Program running on my PC, and had never seen suggestions to use their tech support via GeekBuddy, as I reported in posts like this one: For example, skyglider reported problems where Comodo wanted to use their tech support to solve them in this post
#Comodo firewall forums software
IOW, it's really good software for that purpose.įor whatever reason, I did not see some of the issues reported by others here. I was using it in conjunction with Avira AntiVir Premium as an extra layer of protection, since Comodo provided a nice layer against Zero Day Malware.īut, after realizing just how good their default deny protection worked, I unintalled Avira, since the Comodo software was going to prevent any malware infection by itself. Service registering test: your system did not pas this test.I've been using Comodo's Firewall Product for a long time, as I loved it's Default Deny Protection so that it blocked any suspicious behavior from applicatoins. Screenshot: Test1a -> Test5a and Test1b -> Test5b ( Failed :-TD)Ĭlipboard Monitoring: clipboard content was changed ( Failed :-TD) Webcam Capture: screen is black (I dont have a webcam)ĪntiTest.exe Running in Comodo Internet Security v10. Physical memory access test 2: (winxp32bit unavailable) Physical memory access test 1: (winxp32bit unavailable)
#Comodo firewall forums windows
(Error windows Make sure that the service is registerd) ( Safe :-TU) Service registering test: your system did not pas this test.
(Note: no file was found att the stated location) ( Safe sandboxed :-TU)
Writing file to startup folder test: your system did not pass this test.įile was copied successfully to C:\Users\Admin\AppData\Roaming\Microsoft\Windows\Start Menu\Programs\Startup\TestConApp.exe Registry acces test 2: not blocked by the protection ( Safe sandboxed :-TU) Registry acces test 1: not blocked by the protection ( Safe sandboxed :-TU) Screenshot: Test1a -> Test5a and Test1b -> Test5b, Cannot draw desktop screenshot ( Safe :-TU)Ĭlipboard Monitoring: Cannot monitor clipboard changes Error Code=5 (Window) Keylogging: Cannot set keyboard hook ( Safe :-TU) I agree that Comodo AV is not great, but the sandbox in CCAV works quite well (check this thread in Comodo Forum):ĪntiTest.exe Running in Comodo Cloud Antivirus v55.478 Sandbox
#Comodo firewall forums windows 10
If you use Windows 7 you don't have this problem, that's why in your video everything was fine.Ībout CCAV, I don't understand what you mean with "gloopy".ĭue to the hundreds of issues CFW 10 had with Windows 10 Creator Updates, I have switched to CCAV + Tinywall and I really like the combo. That's why on CFW 10 they add the option to treat those apps in a different way (and I personally suggest to set it to block such apps). *** Youtube live link de-linked as per Wilders TOS.Ībout the comment from Jonathan Marlin, I think the problem is that he run apps requiring elevated privileges and CFW on Windows 10 can run them only as Partially Limited, no matter what setting you have. If I had to use Windows again (ie modern Windows) then I would look carefully at the Windows Firewall first, but - if I had to - I would put a fair bit of trust in Comodo Firewall based on my past good watched your video about CFW vs. So, what I did was turn OFF the learning parts of Comodo and just used the 3rd part (as described) and set up the dozen or so rules needed to run it securely my way.
there was a section where you could configure "rules" for IP's, PC's, Protocols, Ports. there was a section where Comodo "learned" (by ticking "agreement" I think) of O/S components you wanted to allow through the firewall andģ. There was a section where Comodo "learned" (by ticking "agreement") of programs you wanted to allow through the firewall Ģ. Ĭomodo had several sections for "configuration".ġ. So I'll talk about that experience as "info". In older times I used Comodo as firewall to Windows2000.
0 kommentar(er)
